# Supreme Court Rejects Texas Sentence Enhancements | TadLaw

A common problem faced by [criminal defendants](https://tadlaw.com/) is the tendency of prosecutors to charge multiple offenses arising from the same acts. For instance, there are many criminal statutes that allow for “enhanced” penalties if prosecutors can prove certain elements, such as whether the defendant was in possession of a firearm at the time of the alleged offense.

![Court Room - Supreme Court Rejects Texas Sentence Enhancements](https://tadlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/court-room-11791427_opt.jpg)

## What Exactly Is a “Crime of Violence”?

But not all of these sentencing enhancements pass constitutional muster. In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court recently struck down the use of a firearm-related sentencing enhancement against two defendants from right here in Texas. A majority of the Court determined the law authorizing the enhancements was “unconstitutionally vague.”

The two defendants in this case, [*United States v. Davis*](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/18-431_7758.pdf), committed a series of gas station robberies. Prosecutors charged the two men with violating the Hobbs Act, a federal statute that makes it a crime to commit robbery in order to obstruct, delay, or affect interstate commerce. The jury found both defendants guilty, for which they received prison sentences of 70 and 100 years, respectively.

These convictions and sentences were not what the Supreme Court was asked to review. Rather, the justices examined additional charges prosecutors brought against the defendants under a separate federal statute, [18 U.S.C. §924(c)](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/924). This statute subjects a defendant to enhanced penalties–i.e., additional jail time–if the government can prove the defendant was carrying a firearm “during and in relation to any crime of violence.”

Because the jury agreed with the prosecution that the two defendants here brandished weapons while committing their robberies, they received additional sentences of 35 years each under §9249(c).

But the Supreme Court threw out this part of the sentencing, because as noted above, the justices sided with the defense’s view that §924(c) was itself unconstitutional. Writing for the Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch explained the phrase “crime of violence” was the problem, as it was impossible to determine what specific criminal offenses that meant.

The statute itself says it refers to felonies that “by their nature, involve a substantial risk that physical that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense.” But this is still too vague, Gorsuch said, to put any defendant–including the two in this case–on notice as to “which offenses qualify as crimes of violence.”

## Speak with a Houston Criminal Defense Lawyer Today

Criminal prosecutions are rarely simple. Defendants often face multiple charges, which they find difficult to understand even when they are not “unconstitutionally vague.” This is why it is critical to work with an experienced Houston criminal defense attorney whenever you are charged with a state or federal offense.

If you need legal advice or counsel on how to deal with your criminal case, call [(281) 280-0100](tel:(281) 280-0100) or [contact](https://tadlaw.com/contact-us/)the Law Offices of Tad Nelson & Associates today in Houston, Galveston, or League City.

Call or text [(281) 280-0100](tel:+12812800100) or fill out our [Free Case Evaluation Form](https://tadlaw.com/contact-us/) to get started

Criminal Defense Blog Posts:  [New Test Flags Underage Drinking Risk Criminal Defense Texas readers may be interested to learn that researchers have developed a new personality-based test aimed at identifying kids at high risk...](https://tadlaw.com/blog/new-test-flags-underage-drinking-risk/)   [Why Hire a Board Certified Attorney? Criminal Defense Why hire a Board Certified Attorney? Attorney Representation in Houston, Texas since 1992 Board certification is a distinction held by less than...](https://tadlaw.com/blog/why-hire-a-board-certified-attorney/)   [Texas Expands the Legal Definition of Stalking Criminal Defense Definition of ‘Stalking’ Expanded in Texas Texas law treats domestic violence as a serious crime. All reported acts of domestic abuse –...](https://tadlaw.com/blog/texas-expands-the-legal-definition-of-stalking/)   [Unpaid Red Light Fines and Vehicle Registration Criminal Defense Despite Notices, Harris County Will Not Prevent Vehicle Registration for Unpaid Red Light Camera Fines Harris County officials stated that outstanding citations...](https://tadlaw.com/blog/unpaid-red-light-fines-and-vehicle-registration/)

---

Source: https://tadlaw.com/blog/supreme-court-rejects-texas-sentence-enhancements/