# Failure to Disclose Evidence and Your Rights | TadLaw

## When Does the Prosecution’s Failure to Disclose Evidence in a DWI Case Violate a Defendant’s Constitutional Rights?

Even in a routine [misdemeanor DWI](https://tadlaw.com/practice-areas/) case, prosecutors must follow certain rules designed to protect the due process rights of the defendant. One such requirement is known as the *Brady* rule. Named after a U.S. Supreme Court decision, the *Brady* rule allows a court to order a new trial if the defendant can show the prosecution failed to disclose evidence prior to trial that was both favorable to the defense and material to the case.

## Court of Criminal Appeals:

### Failure to Disclose Analyst’s Conduct in Unrelated Case Not a *Brady* Violation

Not every failure to disclose evidence meets the *Brady* standard. For instance, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) recently held *Brady* did not apply to a misdemeanor DWI case where a defendant did not learn until after her trial that there were questions surrounding the reliability of the laboratory technician who analyzed her blood-alcohol test. Reversing an intermediate appeals court, the CCA said this information was not “material” to the defendant’s case.

Here is some background on what happened. Following a traffic stop, Houston police arrested the defendant for DWI and obtained a warrant to take a blood sample. The sample was then tested by an analyst with the HPD crime lab. The analysis revealed the defendant’s blood alcohol content was 0.193, more than twice the legal limit in Texas.

Now, nobody disputed the validity of this test result at trial. But after a jury found the defendant guilty of DWI, the defense learned about an issue involving the same HPD analyst’s work in another, unrelated case. Basically, two different samples in this unrelated case got mixed up at the lab. The analyst then signed her name to a report matching the wrong defendant to a particular blood sample.

As the CCA described the situation, the analyst’s supervisor was supposed to check her work. He then tried to blame the analyst for his oversight by suspending her from casework. The supervisor then misled the trial court about his reasons for suspending the analyst.

Again, this all occurred in a case unrelated to the one described above. But the defendant argued that had she known about this incident, she could have used the information to impeach the credibility of the analyst’s testimony at her own trial. The CCA did not see it that way. It held this evidence was not “material” to the defendant’s case, largely because even without the analyst’s report, there was still “overwhelming evidence” of the defendant’s intoxication at the time of her arrest. The arresting officer testified as to the defendant’s unsafe driving before he initiated the traffic stop, as well as multiple “visible” signs of intoxication during the stop itself. And in fact, the defendant admitted to police that she had been drinking. Given all this, the “undisclosed evidence impeaching [the analyst] would not have impeached the testimony describing [the defendant’s] intoxicated state.”

For a free legal consultation, call [(281) 280-0100](tel:+12812800100) today

## Speak with a Houston DWI Defense Lawyer Today

As the CCA’s decision makes clear, you cannot rely on undisclosed evidence to save you from a potential DWI conviction. That is why you need to be proactive in asserting your rights–such as the right to remain silent–before your case even makes it to trial. If you need advice or representation from a qualified criminal defense attorney, contact the Law Offices of Tad Nelson & Associates in Houston, Galveston or League City today.

Call or text [(281) 280-0100](tel:+12812800100) or fill out our [Free Case Evaluation Form](https://tadlaw.com/contact-us/) to get started

Criminal Defense Blog Posts:  [New Test Flags Underage Drinking Risk Criminal Defense Texas readers may be interested to learn that researchers have developed a new personality-based test aimed at identifying kids at high risk...](https://tadlaw.com/blog/new-test-flags-underage-drinking-risk/)   [Why Hire a Board Certified Attorney? Criminal Defense Why hire a Board Certified Attorney? Attorney Representation in Houston, Texas since 1992 Board certification is a distinction held by less than...](https://tadlaw.com/blog/why-hire-a-board-certified-attorney/)   [Texas Expands the Legal Definition of Stalking Criminal Defense Definition of ‘Stalking’ Expanded in Texas Texas law treats domestic violence as a serious crime. All reported acts of domestic abuse –...](https://tadlaw.com/blog/texas-expands-the-legal-definition-of-stalking/)   [Unpaid Red Light Fines and Vehicle Registration Criminal Defense Despite Notices, Harris County Will Not Prevent Vehicle Registration for Unpaid Red Light Camera Fines Harris County officials stated that outstanding citations...](https://tadlaw.com/blog/unpaid-red-light-fines-and-vehicle-registration/)

---

Source: https://tadlaw.com/blog/failure-to-disclose-evidence-and-your-rights/
